Yesterday was a particularly troubling day for me. In the middle of the afternoon, I received what I can only describe as a bombshell of an email from an organisation within the spiritualist movement. It discussed a personal friend of mine and raised questions about their character and actions.
I have rarely felt so saddened and angered at the same time.
I’m glad to see that others feel similarly. The support shown to my friend on social media has been heart-warming.
Until recently, my friend held a very senior leadership role within the organisation. A position like that inevitably opens you up to criticism and trolls with opposing views. That is to be expected.
What I cannot accept, however, is what I perceive to be the character assassination of my friend in the wording of this latest email.
In my opinion, the language used in the organisation’s email was poorly judged. I suspect even some of my friend’s most ardent critics within spiritualism will cringe at the way their alleged actions were described.
I have known my friend for more than 20 years. While I don’t know all the ins and outs of what has recently taken place, I can still stand firmly behind my belief that they are one of the finest examples of a true spiritualist you could ever hope to meet.
Should evidence come to light that gives me reason to reconsider that view, I am rightly open to receiving it.
The only thing I have seen is the bleating of the same handful of people with personal grudges against my friend, cruel and nasty AI-generated images shared far and wide, and countless social media posts targeting them online.
Some of those posts have been quietly liked and shared by well-known “spiritualists” within the movement too, and I suspect some are now regretting their actions and hoping to avoid being called out for them.
What I haven’t seen though is any evidence that my friend has been harmful or potentially harmful to Spiritualism and to the organisation in any way, shape or form.
On the contrary, the person I have known for more than 20 years is, in my view, one of the finest ambassadors for Spirit, for the movement and for the organisation itself.
One of the best phrases I was ever taught in this movement is:
“Trying to dim the light of another does not make your own shine any brighter…”
I believe the organisation has scored something of an own goal with its choice of words. An email intended to provide “transparency” has, in my view, raised more questions than it has answered.
If this is the “new dawn” promised to members only a few weeks ago by the incumbent committee, I fear it may be a very bleak term ahead for all of us who care deeply about this movement.
For many spiritualists, I suspect this email has felt less like an exercise in transparency and more like a call to arms.
As for me, it has strengthened my resolve to stand by my friend, to speak up for the values I believe spiritualism should represent, and, above all, to stand with Spirit.
I stand with Spirit. I stand for truth. And I stand beside my friend, Jackie Wright.